Milan, 7 October (LaPresse) – According to the Milan Public Prosecutor's Office, Manfredi Catella had an obligation to know the ‘complex regulations’ designed to prevent ‘any situations of conflict of interest’, as demonstrated by his own chats. Furthermore, the Milan Review Court's statement that “there is no evidence” that the property developer and founder of Coima “was aware” of national regulations or that “he could/should have been aware of them” is fundamentally flawed. According to reports, this is the main thrust of the appeal to the Court of Cassation filed on Monday by Milan public prosecutors Marina Petruzzella, Paolo Filippini, Mauro Clerici and deputy prosecutor Tiziana Siciliano filed on Monday to request the annulment of the order with which the judges in August released the 57-year-old entrepreneur from house arrest due to the absence of serious evidence in the case of corruption involving the former member of the Milan landscape commission, architect Alessandro Scandurra.
© Copyright LaPresse
