Milan, May 7 (LaPresse) – “For those who know this procedural case well, it is certainly not through media speculation that the reality of the facts can be changed.” This is what lawyer Francesco Compagna, legal representative of Marco Poggi in the Garlasco murder investigation, stated in a video. Commenting on the emergence of the transcript of an environmental wiretap recorded on Wednesday, the day of the questioning of Chiara Poggi’s brother as a witness and of friend Andrea Sempio as a suspect, who chose to remain silent, Compagna said that it had already “happened with Sempio’s previous questioning” on May 20, 2025, “with the circulation of an image showing a red imprint, which was later discovered a few days later not to be a bloodstain and not even attributable to Andrea Sempio.”
“Now it is happening again with recordings from a year ago, monologues while he listens to broadcasts or podcasts,” he continued. “Honestly, everything but an incriminating element.” “We are talking about a young man who is being hounded and wiretapped like Jim Carrey in the famous The Truman Show, and it is certainly not in this way that one can prove the guilt of a person who seems to have no connection at all with the crime,” said the lawyer, who together with colleague Gian Luigi Tizzoni represents the family of the 26-year-old woman killed on August 13, 2007, in Garlasco.
“There are too many elements that had already been collected and that led to the conviction of Alberto Stasi for anyone to imagine rewriting the history of nothing,” the lawyer of Marco Poggi stated. “We are talking about the alleged discovery of Chiara’s body under the stairs, the concealment of a black women’s bicycle seen by two witnesses that morning, the movement of pedals with DNA onto another bike, the size 42 Frau shoes, the fingerprints on the sink dispenser.”
“Everything that needed to be established has already been established,” he reiterated. “The Pavia Prosecutor’s Office can make all the hypotheses it deems appropriate, but we truly believe there is no room left.” “If and when Alberto Stasi’s defence decides to once again request a review,” Compagna concluded, “it will be possible to confront the real data and not distortions. In court, the proper decisions will be made.”